Medieval History Geek 2011 Year in Review

01 Jan

I’d like to wish everyone a Happy New Year and offer you all my best for 2012.

I’m currently in the middle of putting together a review of Alan Cameron’s The Last Pagans of Rome. If you’ve been reading this blog a while you know I have a tendency to overwrite. This review is testing my limits. It’s a thousand-page book with loads of information and containing some interesting methods of argument which I can’t figure out how to explore without going into a fair amount of depth. I believe that, for the first time, I simply will be unable to say what I want to about it in a simple review but will need to resort to a review essay. This is an entirely different level of analysis, one which I expect will get me into the 2500-3000 word range. It’s coming, I’ll have a lot to say, and I suspect some of it will (hopefully) inspire debate.

In the meantime, I’m going to do something of a 2011 blog review. This will be very different from last year’s which was not exclusively blog-oriented. This year I’m going to focus on stats. The main reason for this is that once I completely switch over to WordPress, I’ll lose my Blogger stats and this will provide me with a record which I’ll be able to recall more easily than something stuffed in my files. I’m also something of a stats geek – in our office I’m one of the two people who ends up putting data tables together and doing analysis, which is fine if I get enough lead time.

I try to avoid posting about my personal/professional life here as I try to keep those separate from my medieval hobby (at least professional – personal’s obviously integrated but who wants to know about, for example, my current exercise routine to get over hip surgery?). I think I’ve been pretty successful. However this past year my professional life had a pretty large impact on my posting habits so I need to touch on a bit of that.

I was involved in two substantial projects in 2011 which resulted in extended stretches where I didn’t come close to posting once a week. One of those was a national project where I was Purdue’s rep collaborating with Auburn University and the University of Tennessee. The project itself didn’t take up my time so much as various other state-level activities related to this project which I became involved with. I was also selected by Purdue to participate in a National Leadership Program which took me out of the state for about 25 days last year. The first project is continuing but the second ended in late September. My putting up six posts over the three months from July-September is a direct result of the final few months of this second project. Other things may come up this year but I will be surprised if they require that kind of time commitment. I made 75 posts this year, identical to my number of posts from 2010. This was actually pretty good when I think of how much time I spent away from home but I still have hopes of getting to around 100 per year. 1

For the year, I had a total of 25,330 pageviews on my blog. This comes to a touch under 70 per day, a substantial increase over last year’s 40-50. This doesn’t come close to some other blogs but it’s OK for me. Gratifyingly, these numbers increased as the year went on. Through April the monthly pageviews ranged from 1,234 to 1,641. Beginning in May they went up, ranging from 1,583 in July to 3,634 in December. My daily high was 211 pageviews on December 10. I don’t have a date for this (it was too depressing to look for) but back in April there was a day when I had just 9. This traffic increase both encouraged and discouraged me from moving to WordPress. It discouraged because with my readership getting to around 120 views/day I hate to take a chance on losing/alienating those readers. However it also gave me something of a “now or never” perspective, which ended up winning out. 2

Within these numbers are some interesting phenomena. Until December, August had the most site traffic, about 100 hits/day. This seemed strange considering it was in the middle of my six posts in three months stretch. However August and early September were absolutely dominated by people reading my review of A World Lit Only by Fire (WLOBF). Based on the search terms used, in particular, “A World Lit Only by Fire Sparknotes,” it appears that high school AP students were looking for help either with essays or exams. Happily, my high November and December numbers were not heavily William Manchester-generated. And at least it wasn’t a University search for “Gregory of Tours Cliff Notes” which was also a common term.

I’ve pretty much resigned myself to WLOBF being the number one traffic generator, much as I wish it were otherwise. In 2011, of the top ten search terms used, nine of them were some variant; “A World Lit Only by Fire Summary,” “A World Lit Only by Fire Review,” “A World Lit Only by Fire Sparknotes,” etc. The only interloper among the top ten search terms was “Medieval History Geek.” In fact, 26 of the top 31 search terms were WLOBF related. It isn’t until the 32nd most popular that other terms become prevalent.

It will be no surprise that WLOBF was my most visited post in 2011; 5,747 views, or about 22.7%. This was much higher in August (56.5%) and much lower in other months – for December it was 200 views, less than 6% (though still highest, barely).

One of the other ways WLOBF skewed my stats is in something called “bounce rate.” This is when someone visited my blog, saw one page and left, never to return. Over 80% of my WLOBF page viewers came to that page, looked at it briefly, then went elsewhere. If this post is removed from the stats, the average visitor to my site looked at a touch over 3 pages per visit. Add these in and it’s just over 2. Evidently, most HS AP students didn’t find what they needed in my review.

This appears to be a good place to start to close this. From a numbers perspective, my top ten pages visited in 2011 were my home page first and WLOBF second.

The other 8 posts (not pages – both my Kalamazoo and Book Review pages received a lot of traffic) most frequently visited were, in order:


Posted by on January 1, 2012 in Blogology


9 responses to “Medieval History Geek 2011 Year in Review

  1. Gabriele

    January 1, 2012 at 11:39 am

    Good luck with the move and a happy New Year.

    New site duly bookmarked. :)

    So far Blogger hasn’t annoyed me too much to warrant changing some 2000 or so internal links in 600 posts, or dealing with the muddle of transfering photos. So I’ll stick with them.

    • Curt Emanuel

      January 1, 2012 at 11:49 am

      I can understand that – it was time for me to either stop griping about Blogger or make the move before the linkmash became too much to overcome. Thanks for changing the bookmark and have a great New Year!

  2. Steve Muhlberger

    January 1, 2012 at 1:50 pm

    A lot of my hits are generated from pictures I’ve taken from other sites. One huge contributor to my total is a picture of Saladin that seems to come from a game of some sort. Next comes a picture of wolves. Another is a picture of a blue sunset off Hawaii which I used to illustrate the occasion of me seeing a blue sunset here in Northern Ontario (never before and never since). Original material by me falls way behind these graphic borrowings. And Markward of Anweiler is far from catching up with Saladin, even if Innocent III thought he was worse than the Saracen leader.

    • Curt Emanuel

      January 1, 2012 at 3:01 pm

      Lack of images is one of my biggest weaknesses as a Blogger. I just don’t think of it. Something as simple as the cover of any book I review would add a fair amount but I keep leaving them out.

    • Jonathan Jarrett

      January 7, 2012 at 11:16 am

      I would echo that, indeed I have I think. It’s weird and it’s not real traffic because they aren’t actually reading, but it gratifies the ego if you don’t look too closely.

      Also, I think you have drawn the wrong conclusion from the Manchester bounce rate: maybe it means they found exactly what they were after and left satisfied. Perhaps you should put the post onto and see how many of them used your text unaltered…

      • Curt Emanuel

        January 7, 2012 at 11:58 am

        Hey Jonathan,

        Hope term break has been treating you well. As for turnitin – there are certain items I’d prefer to live blissfully ignorant of. ;) Time on site was another factor. My one page “read-and-leavers” weren’t on for long, though I guess it doesn’t take much time to copy/paste.

  3. Michelle Ziegler

    January 1, 2012 at 3:09 pm

    If the blogger site is free why don’t you just leave it up for the internal links and put a post/page on home telling about your move?

    • Curt Emanuel

      January 1, 2012 at 6:06 pm

      I had a different reply which I just deleted because as I started thinking about it, that’s not a terrible idea. I could just add a text box at the top saying it’s moved but the Blogger content will stay up. It’ll help other blogs who have linked to my content over the past couple of years too.

      The only negative is I’ve been told that search engines will block you if they find you have a bunch of duplicate content. I’m hoping that means 20 pages which say the same thing, not two.

      • Michelle Ziegler

        January 1, 2012 at 7:02 pm

        The guru of science blogging would probably tell you that leaving a hole in the world wide web is the worst outcome. I don’t think Bora ever believes in taking something down because of the holes/broken links it puts in the ‘web’ including many you may never know about.

        I don’t know about you, but I would know almost immediately if google blocked me from my stats.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: